616 TOTAL NUMBER OF GLOSSES DERIVED BETWEEN REID & McFARLAND 606 TOTAL NUMBER OF ENTRIES IN McFARLAND 404 TOTAL NUMBER OF ENTRIES IN REID 396 SHARED ENTRIES BETWEEN REID & McFARLAND McFarland does not have or missed: defecate [v] | not a problem since the noun & verb root are the same elbow => BIG OMISSION! live, dwell [v] => BIG OMISSION! | tell [v] => BIG OMISSION! | Tagalog toe | not a problem because 'toe' = 'digit of foot' = 'finger' what-you-may-call-it => BIG OMISSION! Tagalog [deic-1&2-dual-nom] that (near us) | Tagalog <'iri> vs. <'ito> [deic-1&2-dual-loc] there (near us) | Tagalog vs. McFarland had a presupposition that there are only 3 deictic positions (as in Bikol and many Tagalog dialect, so that is all he sought. He therefore missed 1 set for Tagalog, Cebuano, and several northern languages which have 4 or even 5 deictic positions. Reid's list is based on one predetermined by SIL linguists (Sarah Gudshinsky among them). So it was the most comprehensive he had at that time (1971). Anything missing from either the Swadesh 100 or 200 word lists was done so because it did not suit the Philippines, like 'ice' and others like 'claw' distinguished from 'fingernail'.